Entries Tagged as 'TELITI'

Invisible Hands: Digging Out the True Motives of Anwar’s Arrest

Malaysiakini was kind enough to publish a piece I co-authored. Thanks guys! -

“When you eliminate the impossible, that which remains - no matter how implausible - must be true”

“In the kingdom of the blind, the one eyed man is king”

Since Saiful’s accusation, things have moved so hard and so fast that real, considered analysis of the bigger picture has been difficult.

Reflecting on the 24 hours of Anwar’s arrest allows us a good chance to take a step back and make some responsible and analytical suppositions.

Let us begin by highlighting some of the more salient features of Malaysia’s current political climate: a leadership vacuum.

Abdullah is universally - and the word “universally” is not used lightly - perceived as weak. Najib either refused to go for Abdullah’s jugular when he could have, or has been held back both now and then by threats of solid proof emerging to validate what are already widely believed implications of his involvement in a certain crime.

Let’s also be perfectly honest. Neither of these men command any serious popularity; I can barely think of any significant group of people who get excited about Abdullah/Najib as their “hero.”

That kind of accolade can only perhaps be given to Anwar Ibrahim, whose single largest failing appears to be not having a total of about 130 parliamentarians on his side at the moment - another considerable obstacle.

Other contenders for the throne are quite simply unrealistic and hardly worth mentioning.

The last few weeks appear to indicate a stalemate, based in large part on the limitations described above to be facing the three men. Abdullah can’t make himself appear strong and popular, Najib can’t shake his ghosts, and Anwar hasn’t yet pulled the rabbit out of his hat.


Invisible Players

The question we should now ask is: what does this mean for other, less visible players and stakeholders in this game?

In conducting this analysis, we must move beyond front page politicians and examine the other power brokers in the country.

For today’s purpose, let’s concentrate on some heads of law enforcement and perhaps take a glance at some former prime politicians.

For these gentlemen, two things are extremely bad for business: a power vacuum, and Anwar coming to power (let us not forget the subject matter of the ACA statement Anwar gave literally minutes before his arrest).

It is worth noting that of the two factors, in circumstances of the former, the latter becomes ever more likely.

As long as Abdullah and Najib continue to fight, Anwar’s chances of achieving the premiership become higher and higher. It appears that some were less than convinced by Abdullah’s and Najib’s 2010 deal - which plausibly was announced to buy time, placate the Umno masses and give the false impression of stability.

Some could very well view that the stalemate that exists is neither a peaceful nor stable one. In the absence of a domineering power ala Hobbes’ Leviathan, warring parties are always likely to continue fighting their war, bringing everyone down with them - the parameters of the game make it such that there is simply too much at stake to act otherwise.


Refusing to be taken down together

One problem that arises is that the “everyone” that stands to be brought down together with the sinking ship may have ideas of their own.

The conclusion that the police were merely flexing their muscles in Anwar’s arrest as a show of brute strength is overly simplistic. The signal was not to Anwar, but to the factions in the ruling party: “Don’t forget that we are players too, and don’t think that we will let you take us down with you.”

Abdullah may have even gotten wind of potential disloyalty where he disengaged the safety locks on the ACA and gave it its own prosecuting powers, independent of the police or AG’s chambers, introducing another player into the law enforcement game because he cannot effectively control the existing players.

This is not a Mahathiresque landscape, where literally everyone in government comes under the premier’s thumb. Abdullah’s weakness makes for a free for all, one which law enforcement actors appears to have taken advantage of on Wednesday.

Far-fetched? Let us not forget that Umno looked ridiculous the day Anwar was arrested. Pakatan and other social movements have successfully painted a picture of the police wherein they are mere blunt instruments constantly misused and manipulated by political power. This is no longer as true as it once was.

Law enforcement nonetheless capitalised very successfully on this perception; few now blame the police for what happened, they blame an Umno that was embarrassed after the debate from the night before; an Umno perceived to be desperate to defend itself against crossovers and Anwar coming in to Parliament at all costs.

As the arrest developed, the terms “own goal” and “public relations disaster” were bandied about liberally; people could barely believe that Umno would be this stupid.

Maybe it was just made to look stupid by forces incognito.


Indirect Attacks

Too much of a conspiracy theory? Perhaps.

One of the oddest aspects of Anwar’s arrest was its timing and manner. Both of these precipitated maximum elicitation of public anger.

Circumstances? Hours after the debate, minutes after an ACA report, an hour early without any plausible reason whatsoever, and with a squad of fifteen cars. Balaclava masks were used as well, but close inspection of the pictures suggests that the mask wearers were in fact overweight, sloppy, everyday cops who were given ski masks to wear along with their goofy vests and plain clothes at the last minute, rather than professional special-ops personnel (they also appeared fully prepared for their photo-ops, never straying far from Anwar).

Was this by design?

What if KeADILan had failed to maintain control over its angered membership, and riots had spilled over into the streets? Would we be looking at an Emergency situation?

Conveniently, law enforcement would find itself extremely empowered, and political leadership may have been forced to consolidate.

Let us also examine Raja Petra’s case. We notice that while we always suspect Najib of behind behind action against RPK, we should note that Najib himself has never been inclined to do anything whatsoever that may call attention to the Altantuya case (such as initiate criminal or legal proceedings, which would bring the matter to court).

More self-indulgently, let’s recall Nathaniel Tan’s arrest. Some may suspect that Johari Baharom was behind it, in an attempt to exact revenge for “lies” published about him on the internet. However, remember that he was (successfully) trying to stay out of the limelight and avoid further mention of his bribery accusations. Recall as well that at the time, Johari and Musa Hassan were engaged in a bitter war.

Same tactics by the same parties?

It is worth investigating on a procedural level exactly what led to the charge against RPK - was it a police report by Najib? Or a police report by some unknown police officer?

Note further that RPK’s trial - in which he can finally reveal to the world on record all his hidden proof and dirt on the Altantuya murder - is set for the exceptionally early date of August 15 (magistrates are appointed directly by the AG’s chambers), whereas his other sedition charge, months ago, is only set to be heard in early October. Presumably, if Anwar is ever charged with sodomy, his trial is likely to take years before it is heard.

Hit Anwar to embarrass Abdullah, hit RPK to embarrass Najib, and all in all, show them who’s boss.


Resisting

The civil servant class of power brokers almost don’t care who is in power; they just want a strong boss who can secure the current regime, and ensure that ‘business’ can be run as usual.

There’s simply too much at stake - and we are talking entire lives and careers forever besmirched and some serious prison time here - for business not to run as usual, or for any type of new order based on integrity, transparency and justice to take over.

Also in the same boat are certain former prime politicians still alive and kicking in the country, actively egging on a return to the old order.

These civil servants seem to have taken a leaf from Wong Chun Wai’s whiny “We’re sick and tired” book and decided to speed things up and facilitate the dominance of one Umno faction over the other.

Just as in 1988, twenty years ago, the movement for change was identified as an easy target to facilitate the achievement of unholy goals.

Unfortunately for these agitators, they are still oblivious to what was written on the wall last March 8th. The good news is that the the voices of those seeking a better Malaysia for all, have matured and wisened up to these manipulations as well as learnt the value of holding fast to Gandhian principles in their struggle.

The movement has also reached out and expanded beyond its original circles to all right-thinking Malaysians, who will no longer stand and watch all that is decent and honourable stolen from beneath their noses.

I think schemers and plotters will find a stronger, more united Malaysia willing to resist peacefully to the very end.

 

 

DATO’ SALEHUDDIN HASHIM and NATHANIEL TAN


Dato’ Salehuddin Hashim is the Secretary-General of Parti Keadilan Rakyat; Nathaniel Tan is facing constant distraction in his efforts to start a new career in finance.

Malaysia 8th most competitive? Research reveals deceptive spin

It’s all over the papers - NST, The Star, Utusan.

We’re 8th most competitive in the world?

At least NST had the decency to include the caveat:

The Institute of Management Development, in its 2007 World Competitiveness Year Book, placed Malaysia in eighth place in terms of competitiveness for countries with populations of more than 20 million.

The bolded part of course, is the giveaway.

So we went to do some research, and found the actual scoreboard for this 2007 World Competitiveness Year Book.

Here’s what it really says:

capture.JPG

As you can see, on a global playing field, we’re a distant 23rd. The magic number 8 only comes out when you eliminate 15 countries above us that have less than 20 million people.

For reference, we were ranked 22nd in 2006, and 17th in 1997.

I don’t know about you, but that sounds to me like a pretty lame attempt to hide the shameful failure of the Abdullah administration to truly invigorate the economy.

Gov’t Lies about Microsoft Survey on Blogs - Deceptive Repackaging to Mislead Rakyat

I love what some quick research can do :)

Malaysiakini reports the government quoting a Microsoft report as saying only 2% of Malaysian netizens read political blogs.

Then how come when I look up that same report, it says that 20% of Malaysian respondents listed political blogs as being of interest?

‘Accidentally’ lost a zero there, DS Lim? The same way a zero was missing from 4,000?

Not only that. Our good minister also left out some rather interesting findings from the survey they quoted oh so authoritatively.

Malaysiakini:

A survey conducted by Microsoft has shown that most bloggers in the country operate blogs for entertainment and to communicate with family members.

The survey, titled ‘A Windows Live Report‘ in August last year, discovered that 63 percent of respondents blog for entertainment and 49 percent blog to communicate with family and friends.

Energy, Water and Communications Minister Lim Keng Yaik, in a parliamentary written reply, said the survey showed that only three percent of bloggers are into citizen journalism.

“The survey also concluded that political blogs are the least preferred, where only two percent of respondents visit these blogs. On the other hand, 81 percent said they prefer to frequent blogs operated by family and friends,” he said.

Ah, so we’re irrelevant then, of course?

Then why is it when I read the survey on which these conclusions are supposedly based, I find it to give completely different results than those espoused by our good Minister?

Yet another attempt to bullshit us? Remember, rakyat pantang ditipu!

A simple Google search reveals a news article on “Blogging Asia: A Windows Live Report.

I will reproduce the highlights, but if you think I’m trying to pull some bullshit of my own, please feel free to click on the link, peruse the article in its entirety and refute anything I say here :)

Here it is!:

Blogging Phenomenon Sweeps Asia

According to New Research from Windows Live Spaces

HONG KONG, Nov. 28 /Xinhua-PRNewswire/ –

Key Research Findings

– Nearly half of those online in Asia have a blog
– 74% find blogs by friends and family to be most interesting
– Young people and women dominate (except India where it isvoverwhelmingly a male domain and Korea where blogging is a part of everyday life for all)
— 50% believe blog content to be as trustworthy as traditional media
– 41% spend more than three hours a week blogging

– More than 40% have less than 10 visitors per week (nat: haha, ok, but I think most of us are ready to share our stats with DS Lim if it comes down to that :)

Asia’s blogosphere is surging forward with nearly half, 46%, of those online actively blogging, according to research released today by Microsoft’s MSN and Windows Live Online Services Business. The research showed that blogging is a social phenomenon with Asians primarily blogging as a means to maintain and build their social connections and to express themselves.

Blogging as a corporate or business tool still appears to be nascent in most markets, with little interest from consumers in blogs from business or political leaders. The exceptions are online powerhouse Korea where blogging has permeated all aspects of life and India where a culture of self improvement is seeing business related blogs become very popular.

Blogging Asia: A Windows Live Report, released today, details the research findings which are based on an online survey of more than 25,000 MSN portal visitors across seven markets.

Social Connections and Self Expression Drive Asia’s Bloggers

According to the report, the region’s bloggers are primarily driven by the need to express themselves and share their lives with family and friends. The highest number of respondents (53%) indicated that they chose to start a blog to share a diary or photo album with loved ones.

The report also showed that Asia’s blogosphere is fueled by youth with almost half of all bloggers (56%) under 25, while 35% are 25 to 34 years old, and 9% are 35 years old and over. When broken down by gender, 55% of bloggers in Asia were found to be female and 45% male.

“User created content and community based online services are really propelling the Internet in Asia right now,” said Alex Stewart, Director of Microsoft’s Online Services Business, Asia Pacific. “With the introduction of easy to use services such as Windows Live Spaces, blogging has moved into the mainstream and become a popular way for people to stay in touch with family and friends. Today, instead of sending out mass emails or holiday letters, people are using their blogs to express themselves”.

Whose Blogs do we want to read?

Most blogs will have a small audience; in fact over 40% of blogs have fewer than ten visitors each week. However in Korea, where blogging is more established 11% have more than 50 and 12% more than 250 visitors per week.

Netizens in Asia are most interested in those blogs written by friends and family (74%) while blogs by work colleagues were the second most popular blog but were a distant second with only a quarter of respondents showing interest. In Korea and India however respondents are most interested in blogs covering a specific topic of interest.

Politicians fared poorly across the region with only 14% interested in reading their blogs except in Malaysia where they were quite popular with 20% listing this type of blog as being of interest. Sporting personalities also failed to impress in general with only 8% expressing interest — suggesting we are more interested in their talents on the field or the pitch than their views or perspectives on life.

India stood out with half of all respondents showing a strong interest in business blogs, ranking them as the most interesting, versus the rest of the region where just over a quarter were interested in blogs written by business leaders. Korea also showed high interest in this area.

The New Fourth Estate?

The survey also shows that blogs are a relatively trusted source of information with half of respondents believing that blog content is as trustworthy as traditional media. A quarter of respondents also believed blogs to be the quickest way to learn about news and current affairs.

Implications for Advertisers

Blogging is a dynamic and exciting online service that is beginning to drive audiences in the millions across Asia. Each blog may not attract a huge number of visitors but there are millions of people blogging and they are beginning to spend more and more time online. The survey showed that 41% spend 3 hours or more each week blogging. Blogging offers brands new and interactive ways to engage with their audience.

“Innovative advertisers in the region such as Lenovo in Singapore and ANZ in Australia are already tapping into the blogging phenomenon and targeting campaigns to users of Windows Live Spaces. We expect as blogging becomes an even bigger part of the social fabric of communities across Asia that more and more big brand advertisers will begin to use this dynamic advertising medium,” said Stewart.

About the Study

Blogging Asia: A Windows Live Report was conducted online on the MSN portal and across seven markets in Asia — Hong Kong, India, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. Over 25,000 people took part in the survey which took place in August and September. The results were analyzed by Harris Interactive, the 12th largest and fastest-growing market research firm in the world. More information about Harris Interactive may be obtained at http://www.harrisinteractive.com .

*

I don’t know where he got the other figures (or if they were made up), but I’ll keep looking.

Don’t try and bastardize the truth, twist and spin the data, or just plain lie DS Lim.

And if you insist on doing so, please try not to do it in a way so easy to refute.

Hidup bloggers! :)

The Bare Facts of the PKFZ scandal - BILLIONS of public money robbed and cheated

Prodigy John Lee was commissioned to compile some info on this disgusting PKFZ scandal, and he did a stellar job.

What we have here is the BN conspiring to rob a bunch of poor fishermen first, and then try to make the rakyat tanggung the gargantuan cost of a completely worthless white elephant.

Kudos to Ronnie Liu, who I always respect for his views on Opposition Unity among other reasons, for tracking this case over the years.

Let’s let John’s thorough research do the talking:

1990s:

- Pulau Lumut Development Cooperative Bhd (PLDCB) sells land to Kuala Dimensi for RM1.37 psf; second portion sold at RM2.98 psf. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/71006

2002:

- Port Klang Authority proposes to buy up land from Kuala Dimensi. Port Klang Authority advised to buy land under Land Acquisition Act, meaning it would pay only RM10 per square foot. Advice declined.

- Port Klang Authority awards sole rights to develop PKFZ to Kuala Dimensi; Kuala Dimensi takes out bonds to finance the project, guaranteed by Transport Ministry. http://malaysia-today.net/blog2006/newsncom.php?itemid=7218

2004:

- Port Klang Authority appoints Rashid Asari & Co, a firm on Kuala Dimensi’s legal panel, to handle the sale. Rashid is vice-chief of Umno Kapar. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/70961

2004:

- Port Klang Authority completes purchase of same land at RM25 psf from Kuala Dimensi. Price of land went up from RM95 million in 1999 to RM1.1 billion in just five years. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/71006

May 2004:

- Auditor-general report reveals that the real price was actually RM1.81 billion (inclusive of 7.5 percent interest). In a supplementary agreement with Kuala Dimensi, Port Klang Authority raised the development cost from RM519 million to RM1.3 billion without explanation.

- The report suggested that Port Klang Authority could not meet its RM2.9 billion obligation (with RM208 million of the RM3.1 billion total bill already paid up). It conjectured that a new Malaysian Ports Commission or the Ninth Malaysia Plan would provide further funding in 2007, prompting accusations of a govt bailout. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/69031

May 2006:

- Auditor-general’s report does not mention Malaysian Ports Commission. It suggests Port Klang Authority “is planning to obtain loans from financial institutions with the guarantee of the government of Malaysia as well as requesting grants to finance the project”.

- It is revealed that in 2005, development costs increased to RM2.51 billion due to “additional development works, professional fees and interest.” The balance of the RM4.11 billion owed will be paid from 2007 to 2017.

- As of Dec 2005 Port Klang Authority holds cash and FDs worth RM231.75 million; after-tax surplus was RM26.63 million. Auditor-general says it “needs to look for sources of financing to meet its capital obligation.” http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/70279

July 2007:

- Cabinet is told that cost increases in the PKFZ project from RM1 billion to RM4.6 billion were made without approval of Finance Ministry, which is mandatory for all cost increases in excess of RM100 million.

- Transport Ministry’s guarantee of Kuala Dimensi bonds found to be against normal practice, which dictates that only the Finance Ministry may do this. http://malaysia-today.net/blog2006/newsncom.php?itemid=7218

*

And the cast of characters?

YB. Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Hj Onn Hj Ismail
- former head of Pulau Lumut Development Cooperative Bhd
- Permanent chairman of Umno Kapar

Rashid Asari
- Lawyer for both Kuala Dimensi and Port Klang Authority
- vice-chief (Naib Ketua) of Umno Kapar.

Faizal Abdullah
- deputy CEO of Wijaya Baru Global Berhad
- Owns 0.8% of Wijaya Baru Global Berhad shares
- Umno Kapar youth chief.
- Son-in-law of Onn Ismail

YB. Dato’ Hj Abd. Rahman Hj Palil
- Present chair of Pulau Lumut Development Cooperative Bhd
- Umno Kapar division head
- Selangor state exco
- Sementa state assemblyman.

Dato’ Seri Tiong King Sing
- Largest shareholder of Wijaya Baru Global Berhad, holds 32.08% of its shares.
- Owns about 70% of Wijaya Baru Holdings, which owns 100% of Kuala Dimensi
- MP for Bintulu, under the Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party, which has been linked to Abdul Taib Mahmud.

Tan Sri Dato’ Paduka Dr Ting Pek Khiing
- Owns 1.36% of Wijaya Baru Global Berhad. His wife Puan Sri Datin Paduka Wong Sui Chuo owns 0.27%.
- Linked to Taib. Behind the Bakun Dam idea.

Datuk Azim Zabidi
- chairman of Kuala Dimensi
- UMNO treasurer

Chor Chee Heung
- Appointed to the board of directors of Wijaya Baru Global Bhd (WBGB) on April 23, 2004.
- On April 19 2007, he took over the helm of Port Klang Authority.
- Transport Ministry parliamentary secretary from 1995-2000 and deputy minister in other portfolios until he stepped down in 2004. The following year, he lost his bid to become one of MCA’s four vice-presidents and dropped out of active politics.

*

For more documentation, see:

kuala-dimensi-company-report.pdf

wijaya-baru-company-report.pdf

*

 

Utterly, utterly disgusting. More BN for you?

 

TELITI: Taiping-Banting Highway - Talam, Europlus, IJM (Pt 1)

I was asked by my boss to do a little research into the company that was awarded the contract to build the Taiping-Banting Highway.

Despite previous attempts, I’m no expert in doing corporate research, nor am I an industry insider. So part of the reason I’m posting this is to see whether people have got more insight they can help lend to my teeny ‘investigation.’

Basically, this project was long ago awarded to Konsortium LPB, which is owned in large part by Talam Corp and Kumpulan Europlus.

I’m not 100% clear on the relationship between Talam and Europlus, beyond the fact that they are basically owned by the same people. Their primary mover is one Tan Sri Chan Ah Chye.

Using the power invested in me by Google and craploads of patience (thanks politikus!), I gathered that Talam has an absolutely horrible reputation as a developer - badly developed properties that have self admitted chronic quality problems, unfinished projects, PN 17 listing on Bursa Malaysia, truly immense debts, and possibly having been blacklisted.

There are a number of one forums (see here) where people have really had a lot to say about Talam.

Why give such a big government project to a corporation with such a ridiculously bad reputation?

Europlus isn’t doing any better, having seen some really bad days.

*

Then there’s IJM. Not sure if I got a good handle on them, but they seem slightly more like a bootstraps constructions company. An Asiaweek report says that they were unable to secure the political connections necessary to do well in Malaysia, they struck out to make a name for themselves overseas.

Which they appear to have succeeded in quiet well. Apparently however, Malaysia is where the real money is, so they’re reportedly looking to expand their local projects. Where better to start than multi-billion highway project.

The only thing so far that raised my eyebrows was that the chairman of the IJM board of directors is Dato’ Wan Abdul Rahman, ex Director General of the Works Ministry. I’ve blogged about him before - he has the same position in LITRAK, the toll concession company :P The board of directors also includes an Education Ministry ex-DG and a guy who was Sec-Gen for various Ministries.

Also, if I’m not mistaken, Syed Mokhtar al-Bukhary is one of the principal (20%?) owners of IJM.

But I guess even IJM won’t touch Talam directly, deciding instead to buy a 25% stake in Europlus.

However, they appeared to wait until Europlus was truly able to secure the highway project before sealing the deal.

I don’t know what deals TS Chan had to make to ensure all went well, but with the project announced by DS’s Najib and Samy Vellu, all looks set to go, with IJM’s buyover probably solving a huge chunk of, or all, of TS Chan’s problems.

*

I guess the core question is again: how can companies with such terrible track records like Talam and Europlus get a multi-billion ringgit government contract??

Anyone have specific explanations? Enlightenment to offer?

TELITI: Toll Hikes ‘07 - Who profits the most off the rakyat’s hardship? (Pt 1: Preliminary findings on owners of LITRAK)

Long overdue, and in light of recent suffering (see Malaysiakin videos here and here) I did some basic checking on the companies that own the highways which got hit with toll hikes. I’ll start with Litrak, the company that owns the LDP concession.

These are only very basic preliminary findings - and may or may not prove significant. Much work remains to be done, and these are just some tiny excerpts. Here goes:

The single largest shareholder in Litrak is construction mega-corporation Gamuda. According the LITRAK’s 2006 financial report, they own 36.27% of Litrak (according to a recent NST article defending the hike, this number is now 42%). The second largest shareholder is EPF, who own less than one fifth of that at 6.40%.

(Incidentally, Gamuda’s share prices have recently skyrocketed - apparently due to a large Vietnamese contract that they won)

I then looked at Gamuda’s 2006 financial report, which states its largest shareholder to be Generasi Setia (M) Sdn. Bhd, which holds 8.71%, while the next largest is again EPF, at a not too distant 7.71%.

The financial report states that a major shareholder of Generasi Setia is one YAM Raja Dato’ Seri Eleena binti Raja Azlan Shah. YAM Raja DS Eleena is the daughter of the former Agong and reigning Sultan of Perak, DYMM Sultan Paduka Seri Sultan Azlan Shah.

There being no website for Generasi Setia, I had to go to the Companies Commission to see how major ‘major’ was.

According to the last available Generasi Setia (M) Sdn Bhd Company Report - for the year 2003 (isn’t it against the law not to submit accounts every year?) - out of 2 million company shares, YAM Raja DS Eleena owns 1,999,940.

YAM Raja DS Eleena is thus essentially the sole owner of Generasi Setia, which is the largest shareholder of Gamuda, which is (by far) the largest shareholder of Litrak, which owns the LDP toll concession that was raised by 60%.

*

Again, this may not be very significant information. Some might argue it is out of context. Nonetheless, as I understand the reports, they are facts.

There’s a *lot* more researching of the available facts that needs to be done to get a fuller picture of what’s going on. But for now, I’ll print what I find as I sift through what’s out there.

*

In the meantime, perhaps we can look at two other small facts that emerged.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors for Litrak is one Tan Sri Dato’ Ir (Dr) Wan Abdul Rahman bin Haji Wan Yaacob. TSD Wan Abdul Rahman started work in the Public Works Department as a civil servant in 1964, became its Director General in 1990 and retired in 1996.

1996 was also the year that Litrak signed a 33-year concession with the government for the construction of LDP (in April) as well as the year the company was listed on the stock exchange.

On the Gamuda side, the Chairman of the Board of Directors is one Tan Sri Dato’ Ir Talha bin Haji Mohd Hashim. TSD Talha also worked in the Public Works Department - from 1959 to 1990. The last five years of that tenure was spent as Director General - presumably TSD Wan Abdul Rahman’s direct predecessor.

*

Again, there may be nothing significant in these little facts by themselves. If there is a puzzle to be pieced together, we are barely beginning. The stuff I normally blog about is getting a tad redundant with all the great voices already out there, so Insyallah, I’ll try to keep on this to see if there’s anything fishy afoot.

TELITI: Mahathir’s War Tribunal - Research on Participants Reveals Complete Lack of Credibility

Tun Dr. Mahathir wants to set up a war crimes tribunal? This looks like some of the least credible collection of “judges” ever.

Justice cannot come from the unjust, and TDM - the man who singlehandedly destroyed Malaysia’s judiciary - cannot possibly be expected to place justice above personal politics.

If Saddam was tried in a kangaroo court whose outcome was always known, do we think that George Bush and Tony Blair stand any chance of being found innocent (a fundamental aspect of true justice) by this so called Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission? Don’t make me laugh.

What you or I think about the war is irrelevant for now. The question is: will this be a fair and just commission? Or just another tool for one-sided propaganda? The most damning facts that determine the answers to these questions can perhaps be found in the composition of the Tribunal for the KLWCC.

The two Americans chosen to be part of this tribunal of “judges” are exceptionally controversial figures whose objectivity must be questioned. Both Ramsey Clark and Francis Boyle have been involved in organised attempts to impeach George Bush.

Mr. Boyle is a legal advisor to the Palestinian Liberalisation Organisation (PLO). He can support whoever he likes, but what do you think he is going to say about “war crimes in Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq?” Does it sound like he’ll be objective?

He also once threatened to sue Amnesty International “for what he perceived as bias in its coverage of abuses against Palestinians’ human rights.”

Interestingly, Mr. Boyle recommended one George H. Ryan, a former Governer of Illinois who worked on abolishing capital punishment, for the Nobel Peace Prize. However, this Mr. Ryan was also convicted of 18 counts of public corruption - the case involved racketeering, bribery, fraud, and conspiracy.

Think that’s bad? Ramsey Clark is a lifelong Democrat lawyer who has apparently done some good things in his life but is also known to have offered help to known war criminals and perpetrators of genocide. The list (have a look!) includes military commanders who committed brutal and heinous crimes against humanity in Nazi Germany, the former Yugoslavia, Liberia and Rwanda.

Slobodan Milosevic was one of the men Mr. Clark sought to defend - the Butcher of the Balkans so intimately connected with the Srebrenica massacre, where some 8,300 Muslim Bosnians were brutally murdered by Serbian troops loyal to Milosevic.

This is the man we expect to pass judgement on war crimes?

Of the remaining 7 commissioners, 4 are Malaysian judges who logic suggests must have risen through the judicial ranks under the premiership of Tun Mahathir. If it weren’t for 1988, maybe that wouldn’t be significant.

*

This post has nothing to do with the wars this so-called commission intends to investigate. It is about credibility, objectivity, and a true sense of justice; without which we are left with a situation in which the unjust attempt desperately to outkangaroo one another while the truth rots alone in some sad corner.

If you really want people like George Bush or Tony Blair to go down in history as war criminals, get some people with cleaner slates to do the judging. Don’t get the guy who manufactuared finding Anwar Ibrahim guilty of sodomy to lead the way.