Entries Tagged as 'International'

America/Malaysia - Hope, Expectations, Race

I write this before the counting is done, but I’m absolutely confident about the result.

I wanted to talk about America and Malaysia, in terms of the politics of hope, the expectations incumbent on the new President, and of race.

My first fascination with Obama came when he decided to focus on politics of hope, and brand his entire campaign around the concept.

It’s fresh, sometimes perceived as naive, but it is something I have taken a great interest in. I was pleased that Pakatan ran on that same platform this last elections, and I think it paid off - as it did for Obama.

I like to see the triumph of hope over fear - the ascendency of the belief that we can be better than what we are, that we need not fear the unknown and the unfamiliar.

I have very little doubt that Obama will not do as well as he is expected to. Like Anwar, the amount of hope that is riding on him - the degree to which these men sometimes carry an entire nation’s hope for total redemption from dark days - is almost impossible to live up to.

The last thing this means is that Obama or Anwar will be bad leaders. It’s just that they won’t be as good as some people hope. I rather doubt any human can.

The good news though, is that I believe that they will try. That they will work hard and try sincerely to live up to that dream.

Naive? Yeah, so was the idea of a black president to some.

Which brings me to my last point.

Now all the non-Malays will want to ask: how about a non-Malay Prime Minister?

I will state unequivocally that I feel that this is the wrong question.

Observe how very little Obama made race an issue in his campaign. Of course, it was *always* there; but his campaign wisely avoided any focus or harping on the issue.

I think what Malaysia needs is good leadership. I really don’t care all that much if Malaysia is ruled by a Malay for eternity, as long as those leaders are good leaders.

I’m perfectly happy to have non-Malay leaders as well, but I think an obsession with putting non-Malays in higher and higher positions is sometimes done at the expense of focusing on quality of leadership.

So I think we should reject an MCA-style thinking about going on and on about a Chinese PM or whatever, and concentrate on getting a *good* PM.

Congrats Mr. Obama - bring good things.

America, Malaysia, and the politics of hope

I couldn’t resist a quick comment after I happened to watch McCain and Palin during the Republican National Convention.

The Obama campaign has been something of interest to me because of the way it is built around hope, change and charisma (sound familiar?)

I was paying special attention to what the Republican response was in those narrow fields. I’m no expert in American politics, but that response seems to be built on a fair amount of attacks, using Palin as a primary hatchett woman, as well as painting McCain as an equally viable agent of change.

The latter is interesting; it appears to be a concession on the part of Republicans that America - perhaps like Malaysia - is so very hungry for it. Of course, they’re in a tough spot, given that the GOP is not only the party of Lincoln, etc, but also the party of Bush.

Thus, a major rebranding challenge exists, which of course reminded me of BN. I was reminded of the weight that legacy carries, and how time can cause serious structural damage that could perhaps be described is irrepairable. Also, there is only so far an incumbent party can go along on the theme of ‘change.’

Superficial though it may seem, especially to my friends who are policy nuts (you know who you are :) , I think charisma will factor strongly in this race.

My impression is that sometimes speeches contain just too many words. I think the middle ground is listening and watching to the delivery,  the trustworthiness and sincerity, when you smile, when you don’t, and all sorts of other body language. Most of all, does the candidate inspire and give confidence?

I think McCain is an eminently decent man, but I’d say the prospects ain’t lookin’ so bright for him. And the Palin attacks? Plain low-brow undignified stuff - they should take heed of the ineffectiveness of personal attacks against Anwar. Viva community organisers! :)

Burmese bloggers charged

Just a posting in solidarity with blogging brothers in Burma who were recently charged by the military regime :( -

YANGON: A Myanmar court has charged popular local blogger Nay Phone Latt with causing “public offence” by posting caricatures of the country’s ruling generals on the internet.

His friend Thin July Kyaw was also charged with violating video and electronic laws.

Latt, a former youth member of Aung San Suu Kyi’s opposition National League for Democracy, ran three internet cafes in the former capital, Yangon.

The two were charged under the Penal Code for “inducing public offence to the state or against public tranquillity”, their lawyer, Aung Thein, said.

He said Latt was also charged under the Electronic Act “for posting caricatures of regime leaders on his blogs”.

The junta was caught by surprise last year when bloggers and citizen journalists relayed pictures and video to the outside world of the regime’s crackdown on monk-led protests against military rule and economic hardship. - Reuters

Online Coverage of Singapore Visit

Just wanted to say thanks to all the kind people who wrote about our short little visit. The most comprehensive is probably Ms. Selene Cheng, followed by the ever affable Alex Au, and the SDP :) Those interested in Singapore might also want to take a look at theonlinecitizen.com, which is a little Singapore Today of sorts :) Thanks again guys, it was a blast!

Singapore: The Next Frontier

Big thanks to all my hosts in Singapore, who took great care of me :)

In both presentations down south, I spent a lot of time talking about Singapore, even though everything I had learnt about Singaporean politics I learnt in about two days off Wikipedia :P

All I read though, I found thoroughly intriguing, and what I saw and heard during my visit was no less so.

At IPS, I had the good fortune - perhaps for my first time in any country -  of addressing MP’s and high ranking civil servants (I was glad to note that Opposition politicians were also invited :). While there, one analogy I used that people seemed to respond a little bit too is comparing the Singaporean government to a parent corporation, wherein each area of governance is a subsidiary company.

The ’subsidiary’ of clean governance, economic management and such are clearly perceived to be doing well and earning mighty profits, as with most other subsidiaries, but there seems to be one subsidiary that is just spoiling it for the rest of the company: civil liberties and responsible free speech. This company is undoubtedly bleeding the whole corporation dry, in the eyes of the world.

There really aren’t many countries for which this can be said, but in terms of right to assemble, balanced media, right to trial, and so on, Singapore is a tougher place to live than Malaysia. If they turn this company around, I really think there’s nothing stopping Singapore from being considered one of the best run countries in the world, bar none.

The following night, I spoke at a small museum to people more from the civil society and opposition parties side, which was cool. Here I spent a bit more time on the need for well-crafted, non-self-indulgent campaign messages, as well as a cohesive and united movement for at least more checks and balances in the government. They seemed to appreciate my appreciation (based on the Malaysian experience) that such consensus building is one helluva headache to achieve :)

I could happily write so much more about Singapore and all the fun people I met down there, but my posts have been really too long as it is :P Suffice to say that I’d certainly be interested to explore ways of contributing further.

Special thanks to Pratamad (who I finally learnt should be read as Prata-Mad, and not as some Sanskrit reference, haha :)  and his family, who really went through a lot of trouble to accommodate me during my trip - was really fun catching up! :)

One of the other true highlights of Singapore? Coming home to polytikus, hehe :)

What if Wan Hamidi had to live in Burma?

I have to say I was disgusted by his piece in NST today. Disgusted.

Before that, related breaking news via Malaysiakini:

Southeast Asian leaders have called off a briefing by UN envoy Ibrahim Gambari on the situation in Burma after the junta objected, Malaysian Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar told AFP Monday.

“It has been cancelled because I think Myanmar feels that they deal with the UN and it is their own domestic matter. This evening, Myanmar objected and we base our decisions on consensus.”

“If they want any briefing, Myanmar will do the briefing,” Syed Hamid said.

:| Yes, I’m sure those generals will be all “Yar… we would like to brief you… that we are umm… are horrible monsters..”

You can’t even have a stupid briefing because of the generals? I really hate to sound vulgar, but next you’ll be sucking their…

Anyway. Back to Wan Hamidi. Oh his piece made my blood boil.

It was very strongly advocating non-interference in Burma, and I can’t help but feel that he might feel differently if he was taken out of comfy KL and put in Yangoon (though perhaps he might have been able to make good friends with some generals, what with his NST training).

I’ll respond to a number of quotes:

SHOULD Asean pretend to be a human rights champion or focus on helping its poorer members to develop themselves to close the gap between the rich and the destitute?

The question for those who believe that democracy and human rights can be imposed from outside is whether they care about the livelihood of the very people they are supposed to rescue from the dominance of the military dictatorship.

Friend, what livelihood is there to speak of when you’re being beaten, raped and tortured?

Do you seriously think it’s only ‘trouble-maker’ monks who have some insatiable mat rempit itch to take to the streets that face the monstrous brutality of the Burmese regime.

Do you think people like you and me in Burma would have hunky dory lives if only those pesky Westerners just stopped muttering about ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy?’

Livelihood is probably something Burmese worry about in between hiding from soldiers.

More on this later.

Let’s look at some of his comparisons.

The fact remains that pre-Asean Cambodia was locked in a terrible communist experiment that cost some one million lives, and other communist countries as well as military-ruled Myanmar remained poor under Stalinist-style governments.

Now that communism is nothing but a name to many, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos are among the countries in Asean that are developing rapidly under a more open economic system. While democracy is fledgling, it provides the opportunity for the people to engage in economic activities.

Don’t get it, do you?

If we don’t do anything about Burma now, it will become Cambodia. Or Rwanda.

Don’t be ignorant. Look at the histories of countries that fell into genocide. Don’t you see the remarkable similarities? Dictatorship, no free media, lots of rhetoric about Western imperialists.

It’s almost as if you are extolling the fact that Asean can indeed help Burma like it helped Cambodia - after it failed to prevent the brutal murder of millions.

People planning to have that kind of blood on their hands shouldn’t try and salve their conscience by planning for some miracle economic recovery that probably would’ve taken place with or without godforsaken Asean.

Yet the usual suspects, the environmentalists, are more interested in saving the flora and fauna of Laos, condemning the dam projects as threats to the environment.

In your quest for economic growth, would you volunteer a dam built over your house, or an incinerator next door? If not, then stfu.

But Laos is luckier than Myanmar as there seems to be no Western-educated opposition leader fighting its one-party system. So the United States, European Union and human rights organisations are not interested in demanding sanctions against Laos.

Wow. I guess it takes guts to spit in the face of Aung San Suu Kyi.

Well, I guess you must be glad that she’s been under house arrest and denied her rights and the ability to defend the tortured for decades.

And yes, there’s a lot more cases the West should be speaking up for that it isn’t. But to say that this hypocrisy totally renders their support for other cases invalid is… how shall i say… stupid.

I mean really, I think this obsession with colonials is something the older generation can’t tear of.

Yes, I was never colonised (was Wan Hamidi?) but I dare to state objectively, that BN colonialism is no better than British colonialism.

So stop trying to heal your stupid injured pride and ’stand up’ to the big, bad, West.

You really want to be better than the West? Then start practising principles. Show compassion and rationality consistently, and where it matters most.

If not you’re just some stupid David-wannabe who likes to tease Goliath behind his back but refuses to do actually face him.

Myanmar is still the target despite other Asean member countries having their own share of allegedly undemocratic practices.

Yeah. Like Malaysia.

But to be distracted by a political issue that could thwart any progress made in the economic sector, especially efforts to empower some 500 million people in the region to be more independent in terms of making money and owning property, is a crime against a large number of people in Southeast Asia who want to get out of poverty.

Talking democracy and human rights should not be just about organising street demonstrations; it is about the freedom to exercise one’s rights, including doing business, making money, buying and selling property, investing in ventures, as well as ensuring there is food on the table for the family.

You know, believe it or not, I’m reaaaallllly not one usually given to calling people capitalist pigs. I want to get rich like everyone else after all.

But seriously. This is too much.

Don’t assume that all people are that selfish.

The Islamic concept of haram comes in very useful here.

So what if I can buy and sell property (my God, he dares to talk about property. Any idea how much the generals own versus how much the Burmese own?) or invest in ventures, if this comes at the cost of my brothers and sisters across the street who are beaten night and day.

You think the rest of us can eat in peace hearing the screams of our neighbours?

*

Do something about Burma.

*

In a previous job, I met a number of Burmese refugees.

I’ll never forget the stories they told me of what they had to run away from.

The beatings. The torture…

The evils of Wal-Mart - Coming to Malaysia?

I think only theSun carried this piece about Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Datuk Mohamed Shafie Apdal saying that they’re looking into bringing in Metro AG and (gasp!) Wal-Mart!

I heard so much bad stuff about Wal-Mart when I was in the States.

Lazy bum that I am, behold Wikipedia! Highlights:

With close to two million employees worldwide, Wal-Mart has faced several issues with regards to its employees and workforce. These issues involve low wages, poor working conditions, inadequate health care, as well as issues involving the company’s strong anti-union policies. One of Wal-Mart’s biggest issues is their high turnover rate – approximately 70% of its employees leave within the first year, primarily due to lack of recognition and inadequate pay.[48]

Wages

Wal-Mart employees earn less than those performing similar jobs at other stores. For example, in 2001, the average supermarket employee earned $10.35 per hour, versus an average of $8.23 per hour for stock clerks at Wal-Mart. The company has paid low wages since its inception. Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton once said, “I pay low wages. I can take advantage of that. We’re going to be successful, but the basis is a very low-wage, low-benefit model of employment.”

Working conditions

Wal-Mart has also faced several accusations involving poor working conditions of its employees. For example, a class action lawsuit in Missouri involved approximately 160,000 to 200,000 people who were forced to work off the clock, were denied overtime pay, or were not allowed to take rest and lunch breaks.[55] In 2000, Wal-Mart paid $50 million to settle a class-action suit that asserted that 69,000 current and former Wal-Mart employees in Colorado had been forced to work off-the-clock

Child labor violations

In January 2004, the New York Times reported on an internal Wal-Mart audit conducted in July 2000, which examined one week’s time-clock records for roughly 25,000 employees.[61] According to the Times, the audit, “pointed to extensive violations of child-labor laws and state regulations requiring time for breaks and meals,” including 1,371 instances of minors working too late, during school hours, or for too many hours in a day.[61] There were 60,767 missed breaks and 15,705 lost meal times.

Illegal use of undocumented workers

Wal-Mart has been accused of using undocumented immigrants in many of its stores and work locations…

On October 23, 2003, federal agents raided 61 Wal-Mart stores in 21 states, in a crackdown known as, “Operation Rollback,” resulting in the arrests of 250 nightshift janitors who were undocumented workers.[64] Following the arrests, a grand jury convened to consider charging Wal-Mart executives with labor racketeering crimes for knowingly allowing undocumented workers to work at their stores.[64] The workers themselves were employed by agencies Wal-Mart contracted with for cheap cleaning services.[64] While Wal-Mart executives have tried to lay the blame squarely with the contractors, federal investigators point to wiretapped conversations showing that executives knew the workers were undocumented.

Labor union opposition

Wal-Mart has been criticized for its policies against labor unions. In North America, Wal-Mart has been successful thwarting unionization via anti-union tactics such as managerial surveillance and pre-emptive closures of stores or departments who choose to unionize….

In March 2005, Tom Coughlin was forced to resign from Wal-Mart’s Board of Directors, facing charges of embezzlement.[82] Coughlin claimed that the money was used for an anti-union project involving cash bribes paid to employees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union in exchange for a list of names of Wal-Mart employees that had signed union cards.[82] He also claimed that the money was unofficially paid to him, by Wal-Mart, as compensation for his anti-union efforts…

I think that’s enough for now. There’s plenty within the original article in W-M’s defence (no prizes for guessing how it got there), but the basic point is, Dtk Shafie shouldn’t be too excited to subjecting Malaysians to these kinds of employers, no matter how low the prices of items.