field
2010 May » jelas.info » Page 5

MK:

Senior Federal Counsel Amarjeet Singh today urged a coroner’s court not to grant permission to commit cabinet minister Nazri Abdul Aziz to contempt proceedings as he claimed the application made was incomplete.

Amarjeet said for contempt proceedings, the court must be satisfied there is prima facie evidence.

He said in this application, the report in question was not produced and thus a proper charge of contempt against Nazri could not be framed.

Amarjeet, who represents the Attorney-General’s Chambers, argued that it was Malaysiakini which should be cited for contempt as the media outlet was allegedly interfering with the administration of justice.

“This is because they came out with the report,” Amarjeet said.

Okok, lemme get this straight.

Nazri calls witness Dr. Porntip a liar. Malaysiakini reports this. Malaysiakini should be cited for contempt of court.

:|

Sigh. I suppose we cannot help but expect this logic from the state that gave us such hits as:

Ahmad Ismail said Chinese are pendatang. Tan Hoon Cheng reports this. Tan Hoon Cheng is arrested under ISA (for protective custody).

We should salute the bravery of Azamuddin Omar, the 15 year old young man who was with Aminulrasyid when he was shot.

Azamuddin has had to give a statement no less than 3 times, and last night was made to return to the scene of the crime.

Even I find police questioning intimidating, and I can’t imagine the trauma of having to revisit the whole scene. Azamuddin however, is showing a consistent commitment to truth and justice, despite these challenges.

Now, an important aspect of this investigation keeps coming up: Were any police lives at threat when they fired at the car with the two boys?

MK:

Among such questions, said Surendran, was: “Was the last shot fired before, or after the crash?”

Commenting on this, Surendran said, “The witnessed confirmed that the last shot was fired when the car was still moving, which contradicts the police version of events.

TMI:

He had recounted how Aminulrasyid was shot in the back of the head, how his friend’s body slumped into his lap and how the car kept moving forward because the dead schoolboy’s foot was still on the accelerator.

He made no mention about Aminulrasyid trying to reverse the car to ram policemen, contradicting police claims of what had transpired.

Azamuddin also alleged he was kicked in the head and assaulted by no fewer than five policemen, before he escaped.

Well, this would not be the first time in Selangor that the police version of events turned out to be complete bollocks.

The important thing however is that this testimony suggests that Aminulrasyid did not at any material time pose a threat to the lives of any policemen.

So why was he shot? >:(

*

On another note: Observe another case of police shooting.

This time, the cops non-fatally shot an armed robber in the leg.

I think we should take this as an example of both better policing and the effect of public pressure.

Even in this case, where the armed individual gave much more justification for shooting than in Aminulrasyid’s case, the policeman wisely practised restraint – maybe due to all the uproar over Aminulrasyid.

I think that’s the way it should be.

Just for one very brief moment, let’s leave politics aside and explore the question of energy generation.

All of us want green, sustainable sources of energy, and we should explore as scientifically as possible which options are the best for Malaysia.

Between nuclear sources and fossil fuels, I suppose I’d choose the former; but of course, these are not the only options.

(I do shudder to think though, what kind of nuclear plant would be run under the current government – factor in inefficiency and corruption, and Homer Simpson comes to mind).

I’ll be the first to admit I’m not an expert on these things though. Maybe you are :) What do you think the right way forward for Malaysia is?

If I’m reading stuff correctly, I think this is Jelas’ 3000th post :P Thanks everyone for coming along for the journey so far – it’s been really nice to have you along :)

The site is still (ever so slowly being redesigned), please feel free to comment along the way :)

Heading out the door, so I thought I would shamelessly copy paste a letter from Malaysiakini that seemed worth highlighting.

The nature of news headlines makes lots of cases no longer in the limelight easy to forget, but it’s to try and keep remembering injustices big and small.

The following is by activist Hillary Chew, regarding her ongoing efforts to highlight the plight of the Penans. Check out her website!

On April 14, three days before a film-screening intended for a Malaysian crowd was scheduled in London, the Sarawak-based newspaper, Eastern Times, front-paged a story drawing attention to the event. It was to be the screening of my documentary film – Penusah Tana (The Forgotten Struggle).

In a highly unusual publicity of the event, the article implied that the film presented a false picture of the Penan’s long-standing resistance against logging. Interestingly, it included an interview with Ajang Kiew, the protege of the film, of which the senior Penan admitted to his involvement in past blockades – the peaceful protest method employed by the Penan that has come to symbolise their defence of their forest home in the high-profile international campaign to save Sarawak rainforest.

Notwithstanding the fact that Ajang Kiew has decided that he has enough of the confrontational ways and now preferred to engage in ‘give and take’ discussions, the historical facts remain that he was a veteran blockader as depicted in the film.

As I won’t pretend to be able to comprehend the hardship that Ajang has suffered all those years, so I would not judge him for his decision in his old age. However, I did make it a point at the screening in London to mention that Ajang has abandoned the struggle and no longer heads the Sarawak Penan Association.

Never did Eastern Times contact me to verify if indeed their interpretation of the event was correct. Neither did they check with the host of the event that the screening was a campaign against Malaysian timber and oil palm plantation industries as they virtuously proclaimed. I have never met their journalist and couldn’t have possibly offended them to warrant such a personal attack that was so apparent in the following article the next day in the same newspaper, again on the front-page.

In the second article, they wrote: ‘Failing in her attempts to sway local public opinion by raising emotional issues such as the alleged rape of Penan schoolgirls, Chiew is now treading on the trodden path of foreign NGOs bent on attacking Malaysian primary industries’.

As was typical of mainstream media reporting, particularly timber company-owned Sarawak newspapers, on conflicts arising from commercial logging in the state for the last quarter century, the Eastern Times pointed its finger at Western media/NGOs evil interference.

Alas, it would be disappointed. Neither was the Western media invited to the screening nor was there presence of Western environmental NGOs.

As for the Penan rape case – public outrage was evident from the number of letters, SMS-es, local NGOs and official responses carried in major newspaper and online publications. The Women, Family and Community Development Ministry promptly set up a task force and the police launched an investigation.

The task force’s report acknowledged that sexual violation of Penan women and young girls was indeed a problem afflicting the marginalised Penan community. Until today, the police have neither officially announced its investigation results nor decisions on the matter.

The Eastern Times surely is aware of the Ministerial Penan Task Force Report which incidentally included the testimonies of the two young victims highlighted in my articles. In the last few years, the plight of the Penan has also been documented by the Human Rights Commission (Suhakam) in the agency’s own independent investigations which showed that the Penan are worse off today than they were 20 years ago and the underlying cause being the unsustainable logging practices sanctioned by the state.

The said documentary was premiered in Malaysia in 2007 and screened at numerous venues and is viewable here.

While not showing much reluctance to use the stick, it seems that Najib has shown particular strength in using the carrot. After the payoffs to the Perak trio and to Felda settlers in Hulu Selangor (Hmm, I bet they wish they could bribe Joseph Breham), we now have a different flavoured carrot: senatorships.

Ezam saying he is ‘layak‘ to be a senator turned my stomach just a bit.

He quotes his involvement in Gerak. I’m sorry, when was the last time Gerak exposed anything of significance? Don’t remember? Neither do I.

And I’ll be damned if he now opens his mouth on any BN-related corruption.

The other senator sworn in? Palanivel:

At a separate press conference, Palanivel dismissed rumours that his appointment was a consolation for being dropped as the Barisan Nasional’s candidate for the Hulu Selangor by-election.

“No, I see this as a role for me to continue with my objectives (to serve the people),” he said.

“At first I didn’t know whether to accept the position or not and was a bit confused, thinking of many things. But the party leader asked me to accept it,” he said.

Not consolation? Of course not :|

The long story short is that under the Umno regime, if you keep your mouth shut when we tell you, whack Anwar when we tell you, you will eventually get paid off.

MIC’s total lack of relevance was proven once and for all via Palanivel’s debacle; basically, they sold their entire dignity – and the dignity of those they claim to represent – for one paltry senatorship.

Ezam – a perfect example of why one’s life should contain more than just politics – made the ultimate betrayal and is now derided equally by both sides of the divide.

His senatorship reminds me of a late Federal Court judge, our IGP and our AG. Two sure ways to rise up the ranks under BN – be the perfect bitch, or make sure you get Anwar. Maybe Chandra Muzaffar will be our next addition to the Dewan Negara :P

As always under the BN flag: power and position before principles and the people.

Sigh, this Hisham:

He said the death of Aminulrasyid Amzah, 14, on Monday should not have been extensively discussed by the public and it had created prejudice towards the police.

“People are angry when a member of public is shot but the same can’t be said when police are shot. They have no sympathy at all. Is there a difference between the life of the public and police officer?”

O.O

Let me answer part 1: there is no difference.

The lost of life of any Malaysian, or any human being for that matter, is to be mourned by all.

Let me also answer part 2: of course there is a difference!

If, God forbid, a policeman is shot by a criminal in the line of duty, we can say: what a brave policeman – an example for all Malaysians, whose family must be cared for and memory forever cherished and honored; and what a horrible criminal, who must be brought to justice.

But what if a policeman shoots someone innocent without proper justification? Then, sadly, the policeman has become the criminal.

Prejudice = pre-judging, ie judging without any basis. But if there has indeed been a wrongful extrajudicial killing, then the judice is not pre, it is post!!

And yes, I bet Hisham and the rest of BN would just loooooooove it if Malaysians never discussed any crimes that might create ‘prejudice’, like oh I don’t know – submarine deals, keris waving, missing jet engines, PKFZ, and Mongolians exploding in the jungle.

Well, Mr. Home Minister, Malaysians will no longer stay silent. I know you have to ‘protect’ the cops who you abuse to protect yourself, but you will not stop the voices that clamour for justice – and a future for our children that does not include getting shot at by cops for no reason.

The Star really has the most offensive, politically motivated and reprehensible headlines sometime.

This Sunday morning, I am treated to: “Wee Hours Kids” or some such nonsense:

The fatal shooting of 15-year-old Aminulrasyid Amzah by police has now put in the limelight this growing phenomenon of teens staying out late.

This echoes that disgustozoid Sharizat, whose analysis of the ‘critical issues’ surrounding the shooting includes:

Staying up late into the wee hours, parents not being able to exercise authority on children, driving without licence etc.

Friends, the parents are not in the limelight here. Just like in the Nurin case, can you imagine the pain the parents are already going through, and here we politicians and their mainstream mouthiepces going on about how it is their fault.

What are parents supposed to say? “Don’t go out late at night.. The cops might shoot you”?!??!?!?!?!?!?

Is it just me or is there something wrong with that line of thought.

What should have been highlighted, if the parties involved were more attuned to the genuine concerns of ordinary Malaysians, is how the Malaysian police have gotten a little too trigger happy lately.

Yes, there are social ills surrounding staying out late, but any attempt to use that as a distraction against the fact that the cops shot an unarmed 14 year old boy to death is unacceptable!!!

Friends,

A few of you have been kind enough to be really long time readers, and you might even have been long time enough to remember this post, where I state what I did with donations so very kindly made through this blog to help with the 2008 general elections – you guys were the real force behind the political tsunami :)

I almost forgot that I had leftover funds from then, and I sincerely apologise that it has taken me this long to finish dealing with it.

I finally finished paying out the remainder of the RM 5263.64, and for the sake of transparency (hi puppy), here is how I spent it. Perhaps the party should have paid for these expenses, but I figured I wouldn’t bother trying to get blood from stone, etc.

If anyone of you who donated objects to the way this money was spent, please feel free to get in touch – nat[at]jelas.info

Hope you don’t mind if I protect the privacy of the individuals involved. I myself am one of the individuals paid (ie, I paid myself) in both categories.

Writers for the Pakatan Rakyat Common Policy Platform:

- 4 individuals x RM 450 = RM 1,800

Support staff for zaiduntukrakyat.com:

- 4 individuals x RM 450 = RM 1,800

Credits for SMS blasting in Hulu Selangor:

- RM 1,700

Total: RM 5,300

The per person compensation was determined by the amount of funds we had left (so guys, sorry you didn’t get RM 500, not enough to go around :P ).

Again, I’m sorry this took so long, but it’s good to close up a chapter. Blogs are great for keeping records :P

Wasalam all :)

Update: Just read of the six arrests and constant harrassment faced by those who tried to gather peacefully to celebrate workers in Merdeka Square, as they have for 16 years >:( Supposedly won Hulu Selangor and still so insecure?? Give the rakyat their rights!!

Here’s appreciating all those who work to keep the earth turning :)

Maybe I’ll just repeat this joke every year, but I once saw this t-shirt: Bad spellers of the world, untie!

ahaha :) Salam Hari Pekerja!

© 2012 jelas.info Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha