field
2010 May » jelas.info » Page 3

ps- Selamat mengundi Sibu! :)

Amidst great turnouts at PR crowds in Sibu, we read of Najib once again relying on blatant bribery:

Making a last-minute pitch in a DAP stronghold, he announced an allocation of RM5 million for flood-mitigation projects in Rejang Park.

“I want to make a deal with you. Can we have an understanding or not?” Najib asked some 1,000 people who attended a public rally at the residential area.

“The understanding is quite simple. I help you, you help me,” said the Barisan Nasional (BN) chairman.

“If Robert Lau becomes the MP on Sunday, on Monday I will ask the cheque to be prepared,” Najib told the all-Chinese audience.

O.O

How can we expect our policemen not to ask for bribes? How can we expect our civil servants not to demand under table money?! When our NUMBER ONE EXECUTIVE is the very one spouting “I help you, you help me.” ?!?

How many times have we heard this statement from the crooked traffic cop, or the government officer whose approval we need for our restaurant license?

How can we fight corruption in this country, with this sort of ‘leadership’ by example? >:(

The question that is really being asked here is: how much is our dignity worth?

In Chinese majority Sibu, I suppose this is an especially pertinent question.

The question may seem to be whether one should choose RM 5 million for flood mitigation projects, even if it means putting up with the same arrogant Umno racism that has existed for decades and continues today ala statements from Ibrahim Ali re: the May 13 gathering -

“Even Tun Mahathir himself had explained that the gathering was meant to inform, and that the gathering was peaceful, just as the Chinese also organise their own gatherings.

“If they do not feel safe with Malays having such gatherings, they can leave the country,” he quipped.

In fact however, the question is: what moral right could Najib possibly have to tie aid for flood mitigation to political choice?

Surely this is a) an election offence, and b) holding the rakyat’s own money and (more importantly) safety and livelihood ransom.

The people of Sibu *deserve* that RM 5 million to help stop flooding, REGARDLESS of who gets voted in tomorrow.

If Najib cannot see that, he must take us all for whores, and will clearly never, ever be a real statesman.

On one hand, credit to the where credit is due regarding the un-OSA-ing of the IGSO.

Inspector-General of Police Musa Hassan said he had no problem if the Inspector-General Standing Order (IGSO) on the use of firearms was to be made public.

“Everything can be read, no problem.”

Good and well.

Would have been even better if he hadn’t continued on with his usual little boy antics:

In this regard, he said, the public could no longer blame the police on the use of firearms against those who violated the law.

“When you know how we do our job based on the IGSO, you can expect what will happen if you do not adhere to the law,” he said.

:|

The first sentence is technically incorrect. Speeding is a violation of the law. Should we expect to get shot then?

The second sentence is even more stupid and inane.

What kind of “Tan Sri” “IGP” is this? Making playground bully threats like this, he might as well use language like:

“If you mf*ckers don’t mf*cking behave, we gonna cap yer mf*cking asses!”

:|

In reply to YB Kit’s tirade against dropping university standards, one professor says rankings aren’t everything.

I agree, rankings aren’t everything. But you can’t be telling me that everything is ‘well’ with our universities?

The recent case where 4 UKM students are facing expulsion for alleged involvement in the Hulu Selangor by-election reminds us what really keeps our universities from being great.

A university can never be what it’s supposed to if it is prevented from freedom of inquiry. Any institution of learning that places limits on the search for knowledge is clearly doomed to obscurity.

No matter how good one’s scientists are (and how can scientists become good without fostering true curiousity and intellectual exploration), the heart and soul of a university lies in a commitment to finding the truth – no matter how many untruths one has to sift through to get to it.

If Malaysia continues to repress students via laws like the AUKU etc, which limit students freedoms of speech and association, we will always be macam katak bawah tempurung, trying to look big with big buildings and infrastructure, but lacking the software, heart and soul to be Malaysians of towering intelligence.

It appears that one and a half people lost their jobs yesterday due to the Bakun Dam. I reckon DS Zubir of Sime Darby can take care of himself for now. What about the other one?

Remember Chou Z Lam? The guy who spoke up after Joshua Wong about political interference?

After clocking in to work this morning, Chou was told by RTM human resources director Mohd Shafiq Abdullah that his one-year contract with the government-owned TV station would be terminated effective today.

“Shafiq said that my contract was terminated immediately due to budget constraints. He was polite and thanked me for my contributions,” said Chou told Malaysiakini.

Following this, Chou said he had to surrender his RTM employee tag to Shafiq, who then instructed two police officers to escort him to collect his effects before showing him the door.

Seriously. Was there a need for two cops to escort Chou?

I would have been pissed as all hell, but Chou? Not only did he have nice things to say about his Shafiq, but:

Asked if his termination is related to his exposé over political interference, Chou replied: “I’m absolutely positive about it”.

It’s inspiring to see Mr. Chou walk out of there with his head held high, and more importantly – his integrity intact. I hope I would have the bravery to make those kinds of decisions.

*

In one of his neverending Tweets, the MP for Kota Belud (in response to Nik) talked about how we needed the power the Bakun Dam would generate.

I replied asking about all the excess power that YTL and other such IPPs generate, that NOBODY uses :P Somehow, I don’t think we’re short on power generators for now.

If so, why all this cost overruns on the Bakun Dam? Why pushing so hard for a project that will probably damage so many lives.

Already one job lost, another at stake over this project, but that pales in comparison to the many livelihoods in Sarawak that may be damaged due to this dam (the very subject of the documentary that got Chou fired)
, the environmental cost, and from what we’re seeing – the massive corruption that seems to be surrounding this project.

Truly, sometimes it feels like money is the only language that Najib speaks.

Worse yet, it feels like money is the only language Najib wants Malaysians to speak:

At the gathering attended by some 1,000 local Chinese school teachers Najib also presented financial allocations of RM15 million for 65 Chinese schools in the district and RM3 million for two mission schools.

The RM15 million includes an allocation of RM5 million to five independent Chinese secondary schools in Sibu.

The remaining RM10 million was allocated for the 60 government-aided Sibu Chinese primary schools.

But please. We help you, you help us,” he said.

“I will deliver what you want, you must deliver what I want and you know what I want,” said Najib.

Eeyerrr!! WTF? Is it just me, or does he sound like a cop trying to solicit a bribe?

It’s really disgusting, the way Najib tries to sully and buy everything democratic with dirty money, right back from the Perak days onwards it’s been a ruthless onslaught.

When it comes to really spend time with the rakyat and pay his respects to other cultures, he suddenly only has 3 minutes :P

Malaysians deserve better than this. They ARE better than this.

I hope the good people of Sibu will send the signal that they cannot be bought.

That the millions Najib throws around to cover his misdeeds belong to the rakyat anyway, and should be given back to them regardless of who is in power, or who wins elections.

No more money politics!

ps- Any thoughts on Jelas’ latest design? :)

A little late, but didn’t want it to go ‘unnoticed.’

There was some controversy over whether the IGP should apologise over the shooting of Aminulrasyid, as requested by the family.

I myself wasn’t too clear on the matter until I started reading it a bit closer. I think I can now summarise as such:

- The IGP / Chief cop of Selangor / Home Minister said or insinuated that Aminulrasyid was a criminal, and had a parang in the car

- Obviously, none of this was ever proven

- Now, based necessarily on investigation papers by the police themselves, the government is charging Corporal Jenain Subi with homicide

- If Aminulrasyid was indeed a criminal or armed, then Corporal Jenain might have been justified in shooting him

- The charging of Corporal Jenain thus suggests that Aminulrasyid was neither a criminal nor armed, proving that anyone who said so was wrong, and should therefore apologise.

This may seem like a small matter, but imagine if your son got shot and killed, only to be unjustly called an armed criminal thereafter.

The arrogance of the authorities in refusing to apologise – quoting legal implications which in light of the above do not make sense – is sickening.

*

Throughout all these crises, one wonders: are we just trying to be police bashers and spread anti-cop hate?

I have attempted to explain at great length why this isn’t so via my latest article in TMI, do have a read.

Firstly, many thanks to all new followers @NatAsasi! :)

“Happy” May 13 :P

I suppose the day should be marked, and I shall do so by sharing some unfinished thoughts about the future of ethnic relations in the country.

I have been thinking about this since Hulu Selangor, which demonstrated a trend of voting along more or less among ethnic lines.

This isn’t entirely true of course, since 35-40% of an ethnic group is still a considerable number.

Yet, the implications for the future of Malaysians politics are considerable. If politicians start to see – as the data might be interpreted to suggest – that Malays are leaning towards BN while the Chinese tend to support PR, the perceived incentive structures of the game may have unpleasant consequences.

IE, the results may encourage politicians to think increasingly among ethnic lines. Mahathir recently commented on this, encouraging Umno to strengthen its Malay base instead of trying to ‘pander’ to the Chinese.

Obviously, this would start a very unhealthy trend.

How do we counter this? I confess, I’ve not fully come out with ‘solutions’.

Over the long term, some considerable overhaul in our way of thinking would be ideal. But in the short to medium term?

Should Pakatan come up with more Malay specific policies and programs? Would this be perceived as a betrayal of their principles, or is it understandable realpolitik?

These things I still ponder.

In any case, on this day, let us rejoice in the fact that Malaysians have truly come a long way (and would have come even further still if not for BN), and will likely never ever again have the thirst for blood on our streets.

:) It’ll take me a while to warm to the new format, but see you @NatAsasi I hope! :)

Zul Nordin:

“Some of the Perak people called me after (Ipoh Barat PKR chief) Fauzi Muda left yesterday.”

Zulkifli noted that Fauzi, one of the founding members of PKR in Perak, is a very influential leader.

Fauzi quit from all party posts yesterday, citing disillusionment with the party’s state leadership and said that at least 500 other members would follow in his footsteps.

“PKR is digging its own grave. Its leaders say that they are cleansing the party of the rot but what is happening is God is cleaning the party of the good people,” said Zulkifli.

“Politically, someone like Fauzi holds no threat to the BN so you cannot say that this was because of Sibu,” he said.

I’ll admit it doesn’t look good on the surface when PKR members leave, but I think “God is cleaning the party of good people” might be a stretch, to say the least.

Some points I raised in a recent article beg to differ:

Fairus Khairuddin recently announced all his debts have been cleared, Osman Jailu and Jamaluddin Radzi have had corruption charges against them dropped, both Tan Tee Beng and Zahrain Hashim have denied accusations that their debts have suddenly been cleared post-crossover, while the latter has yet to deny claims that he tried to get a multi-million ringgit contract awarded to a RM2 company.

There appears to be not an iota of evidence that any of these individuals betrayed their party due to ideology, or any reason that could ever pass as noble or rakyat-oriented. We are not stupid — our eyes see, and our ears hear.

These are all the good people Zul is talking about? Eww.

And I note how he contradicts himself so easily (ingat Mahathir ke?) – Fauzi is a “very influential leader” yet “holds no threat to BN”? Apa ni?

In any case, is the PR government in Kedah about to be bought, just like Perak? I hope all are watching the situation closely.

It’s incredible what the prosecution keeps trying to pull in Fitnah II.

The issue being raised in court today and yesterday concerns – at its core – whether or not the alleged sodomy was consensual, as the prosecution charges.

All of Saiful’s testimony thus far states that he was apparently forced into sex, which is inconsistent with what the prosecution is charging.

Why is this important?

Under a (working) legal system, if any element of a prosecution’s charge is found to be untrue, the whole charge is dismissed, and the accused is innocent under the law.

What this means is that if the prosecution’s charge that Saiful and Anwar had consensual sex is inaccurate and inconsistent with Saiful’s testimony, then technically the whole charge should be dismissed.

For this reason, the defence applied to examine Saiful’s original statement to the police. Of course, the judge:

“Although there is material contradiction in the police report and the witness testimony, the witness’s statement is not in conflict over the incident (of sodomy). Based on this reasons, Karpal’s application is dismissed,” says Mohamad Zabidin.

In Malaysia of course, a material contradiction between a police report and witness testimony is no big deal in the pursuit of justice ala 1Malaysia :P

One has to ask the question: why did the prosecution decide to charge Anwar for consensual sodomy, assuming they knew full well what Saiful’s testimony would be?

June opined that it is because the burden of proof for consensual sodomy is lower – ie, it would be harder for them to prove (for obvious reasons) that Anwar raped Saiful, and easier (through DNA planting, for instance) to ‘prove’ that they just had sex.

Of course, in their blind pursuit of this conviction, they ignored the fact that their charge was not consistent with what Saiful had actually said. The facts are unimportant to a prosecution hellbent on a conviction at any costs.

This puts me in mind of the defective charges from Fitnah I:

What happened in Anwar’s sodomy trial 11 years ago should give any conspirators pause. The date of the offence was originally fixed as one night in May 1994. When his accuser Azizan testified that he had not been sodomized after 1993, the charge was changed to one night in May 1992. When the prosecution pointed out that Tivoli Villa, the place of the alleged offence had not been constructed yet in 1992, the charge was changed to one night between January and March 1993. When the defendant produced invoices to show that the apartment was under renovation at the material time the judge refused to accept it.

Back then, the prosecution (including our friend Abdul Gani Patail) were tripping over themselves just to get some dates right.

To make things worse today, the judge has refused a stay of proceedings so that the defence can appeal the matter to a higher court. Why the rush??

Observe this oddity that followed:

Karpal made the allegation that Solicitor-General (II) Mohd Yusof had “came prepared” for today’s trial and was ready to submit his arguments to object to the defence’s application for a stay in proceedings.

Karpal apparently hinted that the solicitor-general already knew the judge’s decision and had come ready to argue against his stay application.

With all these shenanigans afoot, how can the various arms of government expect us not to suspect a conspiracy and predetermined outcome?

© 2012 jelas.info Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha