I am here not to judge anyone but NO ONE has the right to play the role of God to terminate one’s precious life. Liking to whether a life is to be born or not from a pregnancy, is a course of nature.

Please go find someone who has never hurt anyone (for that matter even hurting oneself) before at any point in his life…….well, honestly you can’t because there isn’t someone like that. So be real and understand that nobody here is fair to say ‘ he deserves the death penalty’.

It is so easy to point a finger at those who did wrong, I am sure you are familiar with that very hand gesture, which actually has 3 fingers pointing back to ourselves….many many times because of our ‘fortunate’ situation, we could somewhat skipped ‘judgement/punishment’ but our conscience knows jolly well we have failed ourselves or others even though our misdeeds are not being ‘exposed’.

Unless you have the power to stop the Sun from rising every morning then you have the power to stop life! Please be merciful because at some point in life, Grace has bestowed upon us, may it be to a VIP or a person on the street…..

firstly, a murder is a murder. wether or not a drug dealer murders people directly or indirectly that’s not the point

secondly, the point is this vui kong character should have not brought the drugs to singapore in the 1st place. everyone in the world knows how strict singapore is to drug offenders. to say that you do not know the contents is a lame excuse to escape punishment. everyone has a choice. he already made his choice.

thirdly, all laws in the world must be respected. even malaysian government also give out death penalty to drugs offenders. maybe seej002 failed to see of what is happening to other countries who don’t have stiff sentence or punishment to drug traffickers.

by the way seej0002, people are not only concerned by the number of people killed by drugs but rather how drugs killed the moral system of a certain society.

I’m of the opinion that Vui Kong should not be hanged. So just here to give my 2 cents and hopefully convince some people. =)

1. The druggies in Simpang Renggam prison – are they facing a death penalty? If they are, maybe they need help. If they aren’t, then they should be thankful that they have a chance to remedy their ways unlike Vui Kong here. Point: This case is indeed deserving of attention, contrary to your opinion, because it involves a life and death situation.

2. Everyone thinks they know that drug trafficking is a big time offence because they’ve been brought up to think that way, and apply these mindsets blindly to every drug trafficking case they come across. Well, I tell you solemnly, just because everyone thinks this way, doesnt mean that they are right. This is perhaps, what you’d call herd mentality and coupled with tyranny of the majority, it is really something terrible. Just because society is the one that decides to kill Vui Kong doesn’t make this act of murder any less sinful. You are merely supporting legalized killing because everyone else thinks it’s right. But I wonder, have you ever considered the moral grounds on which to support such an execution, especially in Vui Kong’s case? What benefit would it do to society, to kill someone who is already remorseful and unlikely to commit the same crime again? If you say deterrence, then you are making an already repentful person your scapegoat as a means to achieve an end that is not yet proven in itself.

http://www.helium.com/debates/66220-is-the-death-penalty-an-effective-crime-deterrent

3. Although drug trafficking harms people, it is through an indirect way. I believe that Vui Kong had no intention to harm drug consumers when he smuggled them in – his underlying stimulus was perhaps purely monetary return. Since he did not intend the harm directly, I think he should not be given such a strict sentence. Drug trafficking, I feel, is not as serious a crime as rape or murder or (maid/ child etc) abuse, which directly violates the human dignity. And yet, i find it strange that these more heinous crimes should have a lighter penalty than drug trafficking. Furthermore, this death penalty penalizes the person trafficking the drugs, but not the forces of supply (the kingpins) or demand (the consumers) that inspired the need for this “shipping service”. It does not solve any problem at all – because the supply of drugs and the demand for them will still be there, all the suppliers need to do is to find another poor, desperate, wretched soul, offer him a bunch of money to risk his neck, to keep their trade going.

4. I’d like to say to the 3rd commentor up there, I agree with there not being not much chance left, but in spite of that, I’ve already written in. This is because, I dont want to be part of the bystander effect, where all the bystanders know that something is wrong, but they wait for someone else to take the action. My point is, chance or no chance, if you just stand by and do nothing, this chance (of saving a life) will be even slimmer, not just to yourself, but to everyone who shares the same opinion as you.

End of 2 cents =D If anyone has other points of view (contrary or not), it might be good to add.

What the hell are you doing Nat????

Are you lack of supporters and looking for drug dealers and addicts to support you!!!!

WHATAFAK???

You might as well go help all those druggie inside Simpang Renggam prison.

You have nothing better to do??? Or is that you have ran out of topic to blog???