Anwar accused of sodomy again: “Coincidental” Timing? Or did Anwar have the 50 MP’s he needed?

update, 1.45am: An official press statement confirms the SMS account; Anwar calls the police report a fabrication, states that he has those documents, and will persist in revealing them. Statement is reproduced in full below.

update 12.50am: KeADILan’s SMS service says that Anwar recently came into possession of documents proving Musa Hassan and Gani Patail fabricated evidence in ‘98. Not sure about the source, just passing on what I got.

Who knew the government would be so amazingly stupid as to think that this, of all tricks, would appear credible to the world – least of all to Malaysians – at a time like this.

BN has failed to learn the single most important lesson of March 8th: the rakyat is not stupid.

Is it not the height of desperation to have the most ludicrous of accusations against Anwar, already recently proven in court to be absolute bullshit, resurface at a time when:

a) he has publicly declared that he has the MP’s he needs to form the government

b) SAPP has just made their declaration

c) BN’s popularity is at its lowest levels in history

d) RPK made a statuary declaration about Rosmah being at the scene of Altantuya’s murder

e) A big anti fuel hike protest was set for 6th July

clearly means that obviously, something is going on that stinks.

No comment for now on the individual who made the accusations, or the circumstances surrounding that accusation. I’m just going to follow the developments closely first.

Be on your watch, Malaysia, the soul of our nation may be hanging in the balance.

If anyone needs a reminder of what bullshit this was the last time:

*

Official Press Statement by Anwar:

June 29, 2008, SHAH ALAM, MALAYSIA

The police report lodged against me earlier today is a complete fabrication. I believe we are witnessing a repeat of the methods used against me in 1998 when false allegations were made under duress. This is clearly a desperate attempt by the Barisan Nasional regime to arrest the movement of the Malaysian people towards freedom, democracy and justice.

The report has been organized by interested parties to attack me in retaliation for evidence I have recently obtained implicating IGP Musa Hassan and the AG Gani Patail in misconduct including fabrication of evidence in the cases launched against me in 1998-1999. This vile attack will not prevent me from releasing this dossier to the public.

I urge the Malaysian people to stand against the repressive forces that will be unleashed by the government in the coming days and weeks. We expect the media, the judiciary and the police force to all come under the direct and unchecked control of the executive.

My fellow Malaysians – we took a bold step forward on March 8th towards a new dawn for freedom and justice for all of our citizens. This people’s movement for change must go on with all of our strength and conviction.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

22 Responses to “Anwar accused of sodomy again: “Coincidental” Timing? Or did Anwar have the 50 MP’s he needed?”

  1. [...] Anwar accused of sodomy again: “Coincidental” Timing? Or did Anwar have the 50 MP’s he needed? by Nathaniel Tan [...]

  2. MORE victims of Anwar’s sodomy please lodge a police report. Do not be afraid. He cannot harm you like he did to millions of Malaysians in 1997/8. Let Anwar whois a “puppet” of the CROOKS that are murdering so many Muslims and innocent lives be exposed!!! Free the nation once and for all by sending him to prison why he belongs!!!! All Malaysians deserve to know the truth about Anwar, the real Anwar!!!

  3. I have blocked from posting more comments on RPK’s blogs for obvious reasons for exposing Anwar to have committed sodomy acts and betrayal to the nation. Thus RPK’s intention for posting defamatory comments against existing leaders and their families is obvious and they are nothing but lies lies lies to fool you all. So I urge you all not to be fooled by RPK.

    Cheers from NZ

    BobbyNZ

  4. How ironic, I have been banned six times by MT for criticizing PR and Anwar.

    It is pretty convenient calling it a political conspiracy Nat.

    When Anwar is released, it is called justice. But when a guy makes a police report, he is straight away condemned as a liar and it is called a political conspiracy. How convenient.

  5. How convenient it is also for you to totally believe Anwar is guilty of sodomy while totally not believing that Najib is guilty of murder? Bobby, don’t you have a life? I’ve been seeing you post your rantings in numerous websites at every hour of the day, no need to work is it?

    If Bobby thinks that people will swallow this shit like they did 10 years ago, then you are sadly mistaken. If this does go through, then Malaysia would suffer irreplaceable damage. Hope you enjoy seeing the country engulfed in chaos.

  6. Under these circumstances, I can only say.
    All parties concerned, GOD BLESS YOU.

    Our nation is on the brink of turmoil.
    We are hoping for an end to all since 08/03/08 but now,
    it has only escalated.
    Stop all these selfish bickering.!
    Have you thought about the future of MALAYSIA.
    Where are we heading?
    What is the world reaction to this?
    Are we (rakyat) going to suffer from this?

  7. I think Bobby could be employed by BN to make those comments. Anyway, the rakyat should not jump into conclusions at the moment.

    I say let DSAI release the evidence that the current IGP and AG fabricated evidence in 1998. Then we would know whether it is the police who sodomised the poor guy and force him to make a report against DSAI. After all, recent developments showed us that the police force people to perform oral sex. One young police officer also went as far as raping a girl in the police station.

  8. Truth and Justice do you get them in this Bolehland?
    Bobby, are you one of the sodomised victims that have affected
    thinking…..your crooked thoughts are signs of a disabled.

  9. Saya dah mula membenci UMNO. Bukan BN. Walau pun saya ahli UMNO, nampaknya sekarang saya dah hilang keyakinan terhadap UMNO. Be more professional lah oooiiii.. UMNO dah nampak pintu kehancuran sebab itu lah perkara sebegini berlaku. KOTOR. TAK GENTLEMAN!

  10. [...] Nat Tan [...]

  11. Nat, you should have volunteered a statement about your relationship with Anwar. You would have been the prime witness and turn out stinking rich.

    not too late yet, just drop KJ an email.

  12. My motive for exposing Anwar is simply to seek justice guys. I am in a position to expose him and the CROOKS at large because I have been “reliably informed”.

    Cheers mate

    BobbyNZ
    p/s I volunteer to get Anwar a dildo to satisfy his perversion if he is imprisoned.

  13. Bobby,

    The way you wrote this article…similar like KJ. Are u KJ anyway???
    No wonder…..oh well….whatever…

  14. Hai Bobby NZ ,

    Promoting our wares here , are we !

  15. [...] hoping to get my last crack of the day. I was on emails, forums, blogs and readers. And then I saw Nat’s posting as well of several others on a new sodomy charge against Anwar Ibrahim. I am not quite a fan of the [...]

  16. Full Name: Mohd. Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan
    IC No.: 850706-01-5687
    IPTA: UNITEN
    Student ID: EP075085
    Course: Electrical & Electronic Engineering
    Friendster: http://profiles.friendster.com/saifulbukhari
    Other Activities:
    * Participant, 2nd ASEAN Student Leader’s Summit & Cultural Festival, Philippines (January 22-26, 2007)
    * Deputy President (I) Majlis Perwakilan Pelajar UNITEN (2006/2007)

  17. Din Merican writes:

    This is the accuser, Saiful Bukhari (picture in red neckie). My colleagues and I knew that he was planted by the other side. So we kept him under surveillance since the day he turned up in our office just before the March 2008 elections. It was a matter of time and we would have exposed him as someone with links to the office of the Deputy Prime Minister. He knew that the noose was tightening around his neck.”

    More here:

    The accuser and some information where they work for Najis

    http://www.malaysia-today.net/2008/content/view/9361/84/

    http://riwayathayat.blogspot.com/2008/02/selamat-maju-jaya-saiful.html

  18. [...] Anwar accused of sodomy again: “Coincidental” Timing? Or did Anwar have the 50 MP’s he needed? [...]

  19. “Can the tall built simply screwed from northen orifice? ” Everybody will put objection

    He is too strong to reverse screw other orifice, this one seems more realistic.

  20. I quoted this from renovatio blogged by stephendoss concrning about Anwar sodomise cases issued previously..checked it out..

    “FOR THE BENEFIT OF READERS, I HAVE EXTRACTED FROM THE PAST THE JUDGMENT BY THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA, ANWAR’S APPEAL AGAINST HIS CONVICTION ON SODOMY. THE FOLLOWING IS A MAJORITY DECISION REACHED BY THE JUDGES SITTING IN THE FEDERAL COURT ON THE ANWAR IBRAHIM APPEAL AGAINST HIS CONVICTION ON SODOMY.

    PLEASE NOTE AND READ CAREFULLY THE VERDICT, THAT ALTHOUGH THE JUDGES HAD NO DOUBT IN THEIR MINDS THAT THE ACT OF SODOMY BY ANWAR IBRAHIM HAD TAKEN PLACE, BUT TO RELY SOLELY ON AZIZAN’S EVIDENCE WOULD BE UNSAFE FOR THE PURPOSES OF UPHOLDING THE JUDGEMENT.

    SO DID THE ACT OF SODOMY TAKE PLACE ? YES ACCORDING TO THE JUDGES. BUT DUE TO A TECHNICALITY THEY HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO DISMISS THE CASE.

    DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA

    (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN)

    RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 05-6-2003 (W)

    ANTARA

    DATO’ SERI ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM … PERAYU

    DAN

    PENDAKWA RAYA … RESPONDEN

    RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. 05-7-2003 (W)

    SUKMA DARMAWAN SASMITAAT MADJA … PERAYU

    DAN

    PENDAKWA RAYA … RESPONDEN

    CORAM:

    ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD F.C.J.

    RAHMAH HUSSAIN F.C.J.

    TENGKU BAHARUDIN SHAH TENGKU MAHMUD J.C.A.

    MAJORITY JUDGMENT OF

    ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD F.C.J.

    AND TENGKU BAHARUDIN SHAH TENGKU MAHMUD J.C.A.

    In this judgment, Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim will be referred to as “the first appellant” and Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja will be referred to as “the second appellant”.

    The first appellant was charged with an offence punishable under section 377B of the Penal Code.

    The second appellant was charged with two offences. The first charge is for abetting the first appellant in the commission of the offence with which the first appellant was charged. The second charge is similar to the charge against the first appellant i.e. under section 377B of the Penal Code.

    Both the appellants were tried jointly. The first appellant was convicted and sentenced to nine years imprisonment commencing from the expiry of the sentence he was then serving in the first trial. High Court Kuala Lumpur Criminal Trial No. 45-48-1998 (1999)2 M.L.J. 1 (H.C), (2002)2 M.L.J. 486 (C.A.) and (2002) 3 M.L.J. 193 (F.C.)). The second appellant was convicted on both charges and sentenced to six years imprisonment and two strokes for each charge with the sentences of imprisonment to run concurrently. For the judgment of the High Court in the present case, see (2001) 3 M.L.J. 193.

    They appealed to the Court of Appeal. Their appeals were dismissed – see (2004) 1 M.L.J. 177.

    They appealed to this court and this is the majority judgment of this court.

    Section 87(3) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (“CJA 1964”) provides that a criminal appeal to this court “may lie on a question of fact or a question of law or on a question of mixed fact and law.” The position is the same as in the case of the Court of Appeal hearing an appeal from a trial in the High Court as in this case – see section 50(3) CJA 1964.

    To summarise our judgment, even though reading the appeal record, we find evidence to confirm that the appellants were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen, sometime, this court, as a court of law, may only convict the appellants if the prosecution has successfully proved the alleged offences as stated in the charges, beyond reasonable doubt, on admissible evidence and in accordance with established principles of law. We may be convinced in our minds of the guilt or innocence of the appellants but our decision must only be based on the evidence adduced and nothing else.”

  21. Bobby, stop wasting our time.
    F*** off and plant rice in the bush, at least you’ll be doing something productive for the nation.

    Because of this embarassing accusation, more people are going to support the opposition.

    Just wait you see bitter ones, a big tidal change will come.

  22. bobbynz is crazy. hope that bn-umno crumbles to dust. god pls save malaysia. or else malaysia is doomed. stupid bn-umnoputras thinking only of their pocket money. selfish ignorant fools. especially nazri aziz. stupid ignorant . you too bobbyNZ is a child. fuck u who sokong umno and vote bn in the last election. .

    malaysia will probably be another iraq.

Discussion Area - Leave a Comment