Entries Tagged as ''

Perak: BN still anti-hopping?

Update - So it appears all is back to ‘normal‘ :P

I’m afraid I don’t have anything very insightful to say about Buntong/Perak. Being patient about the Perak MB issue has helped in the past - whether it will again, I suppose time will tell. It’s always good not to get too over-excited in the early stages.

Again, it’s all very early, but I do find myself asking, will BN hold true to its anti-hopping stance in Perak?

By the by, I had this very random thought, with regards to the earlier discussion on party hopping (you can also see Tian’s latest on this).

Many have made their feelings felt on the ethics of individuals changing parties. What about parties changing coalitions (eg, Gerakan leaving BN and crossing the floor en masse- as it should have eons ago)? How do those same moral questions effect that particular equation?

Again, I do feel this is all rather academic at this point, but truth be told, I don’t have a whole lot of more exciting things to blog about just this second :P :) Your thoughts?

*

Some little points: on the Perak MB side, Malaysian Unplugged did a kind service of translating/summarising a pretty good Sin Chew interview. In Selangor, this comes a little late, but those interested in hearing TS Khalid’s defence in light of recent criticisms- while one alternative view is found here.

Tags-,

Clarifications on Party Hopping

Had some good conversations with Tirath on this :)

I would like to stress again that a) I do not feel super strongly about this one way or the other at this point b) KeADILan’s official position is that this is not a priority for now (compared to say, running the state governments properly).

All that said, I was listening in to some conversations the other day that brought up a number of interesting facts on this case, which I highlight here merely for the purposes of information.

1.
With regards to the suggestion that individuals intending to cross over first step down and re-contest under a different banner in a by-election, I was reminded that an individual cannot resign his or her seat and recontest there again in the resulting by-election. So, cool though the suggestion may be, I think it is not allowed by law.

2.
Comparatively speaking, there appear to be few precedents in other countries for the institution of anti-hopping laws. There is also a question of whether it is consistent with constitutional guarantees of freedom of association.

3.
Perhaps most importantly, it is important to note that party affiliation is not the be all end all. Each member of Parliament is allowed to vote this way or that based on their conscience (whether their party membership survives is another matter). What I think this means is that on a purely technical level, every single BN MP is perfectly able to vote, for instance, in support of a motion of no confidence in Abdullah - or any other motion for that matter.

So, these are just some technical details that might be useful to the debate. Once again, I fully affirm the legitimate objections and concerns of some individuals with regards to this matter - including questions of morals, ethics and so on. To me, they are open questions - especially at this point.

My personal feeling is that this will not be a major issue in the weeks to come. Sure, things are quite volatile and subject to quick changes right now, but I think we will not be reaching this bridge for a while yet.

If and when we do, I look forward to informed, mature discussions on the matter :)

Tags-

What does Abdullah’s/Umno’s turmoil mean for the rakyat?

Rumours abound on Abdullah’s resignation, etc, etc.. As in all rumours, I don’t put much stock in them. Rumours have never been my friend, and while I definitely concur that his position is severely weakened after repeated bashings (Terengganu being the latest), unseating an incumbent is hard - as history clearly shows.

This climate of speculation however is a good a time as any for me to weigh in on some issues.

On an extremely hypothetical level, let’s ask who would replace Abdullah? Najib, Ku Li, Muhiyiddin, etc2?.. I have to say, none of these strike me as being particularly good for the long term future of the country. That’s not to say that any of them can necessarily save Umno/BN.

In any case, where does that leave us?

There has been a lot of interesting discussion about the opposition taking over government via the katak phenomenon.

Talk on this is rife because in all honesty, 30 seats is not a particularly large number in politics.

In a situation like this, every party, every MP even, is a kingmaker. This is ever more true now that Umno elections are confirmed to happen as scheduled (see Malaysiakini).

Despite the losses, there’s probably no better time to be an Umno leader - some people are going to get really rich.

That notwithstanding, on the ideological front, it is not unreasonable to expect that the few Umno leaders with principle might consider switching to a party that will in effect do more for the Malay grassroots, stand behind a real leader of calibre, and return some level of integrity to Malaysian politics.

As for the other parties, one has to once again question why parties like MCA, MIC and Gerakan would continue to support a party based on racist supremacy - especially when there once perceived to be invincible incumbency is now hanging so precariously in the balance. And in forty odd years, Sabah & Sarawak as a whole (select cronies not included) has consistently gotten a terribly raw deal from the federal government.
So, lots of kingmaking opportunities. We must then question the morality of party hopping.

At first, it had never occurred to me that there were any moral questions at all here, but I read with keen interest the literature on the web.

I confess that I do not find all the arguments against party hopping convincing. I also read with great interest Malik Imtiaz’s legal opinion on this matter.  (Can’t help but point out too that party hopping was never a problem for BN in the past..)

Nonetheless, when I look at the suggestion that any representative hoping to hop over resign his/her seat and recontest under a different flag, I can’t find any significant shortcoming with the idea.  After all, it seems perfectly reasonable.

In the larger context, I really hope everyone will pay attention to the fact that most party leaders have stressed repeatedly that the focus is on building up the state governments and making sure they do their job right as rain. I am sympathetic to the view that there is no point in rushing into anything, and that a considered approach towards reaching that simple majority in Parliament is reasonable.

I am generally not of the view that such an attempt would be morally wrong, especially given how this may in fact be a once in a lifetime opportunity to begin the end of racial politics in Malaysia, and even more so if we follow the principle of resigning for a by-election for each intended crossover. There’s also the question of how many seats we would have won had there been indelible ink and no postal votes (and no 3 corner fights in Sabah/Sarawak, sigh).

In any case, once the Umno election process starts up, things are going to heat up - providing opportunities for a whole lot of different people.

The late 80’s and 90’s suggest however, that when Umno fights internally, it’s the rest of us that get whacked (Reformasi, Operasi Lalang.. Particularly ironic to see Ku Li considering challenging the Umno President again). We really cannot yet rule out a vicious and brutal crackdown by BN if they start getting too antsy.

So yes, interesting times. Whatever happens, we must keep our heads and keep our principles. Even if by another miracle a new federal government is formed, let’s be firm but patient with them as we are firm but patient with the new state governments. Let’s also never lose sight of the eternal need for a good set of checks and balances.

Tags-

Internet Recognition & Evolution

Malaysiakini:

Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi today said his “biggest mistake” in disastrous elections was to ignore cyber-campaigning on the Internet which was seized by the opposition.

“We certainly lost the Internet war, the cyber-war,” Abdullah said.

Ah, better savour the moment, however briefly :)

As I said in the post directly below though, I certainly concur with the many views expressed in Malaysiakini (including my uncle’s! Cool :) about how it wasn’t about the medium, it was about the message. No amount of cyber-campaigning can cover up the truth.

With RPK’s multi-million dollar fine though, it’s obvious cyberspace isn’t quite safe just yet (I’m still trying to ascertain the facts of that particular case - if it’s truly plagarism again, tch tch).

*

It’s weird though, in the aftermath. I feel I’ve been having a bit of trouble finding my cyber-voice in this new political climate. Well, I guess it’s not just my cyber-voice; many other things remain to be settled. I don’t particularly thrive in uncertainty, but will just have to be patient and ride it out I guess.

So, apologies if I still appear to be figuring out the directions of this blog :)

Tags-

Evolution, Extinction & a Two Party System

During campaign ceramahs, I talked about how Malaysians don’t get a chance to write the long letters they might want to on their ballots. We just get one X.

It’s unwise to try and discern too deeply why each Malaysian X’ed what they did, but perhaps we can look into what March 8 and the two weeks that followed mean for the future.

Very briefly, I would say the results suggest that at the very least, the rakyat will not tolerate a combination of excessive corruption and weak leadership; they will also not be cowered by race-based rhetoric and fear mongering.

Where the latter is concerned, it is worth noting the threats that fell on deaf ears during this GE: vote Umno or lose your Malay rights, vote MCA or the Chinese voice will disappear from Cabinet, vote MIC or ELSE..

Turns out the rakyat is much braver, and much wiser than BN thought.

On the governance front, it seems quite clear that there is a limit to how much corruption and inept governance the rakyat will tolerate, especially in an era where alternative sources of information are readily available.

All this combined with rising cost of living & crime, plus compelling alternative explanations as to why such things were spiraling out of control likely played a big part in the electoral outcome.

It’s pretty obvious what the ‘good guys’ have to do - don’t screw up the 5 states, cooperate properly, keep your promises, serve the people faithfully, and so on.

But what now for BN?

Where race is concerned, staying the present course is likely to only bring the same results or worse. Genuine change can happen in one of at least two directions.

Firstly, they can go harder to the right and become more ultra-Malay/Chinese/Indian. Of course this is not entirely practical for the whole of BN. Umno & MCA cannot simultaneously go ultra-Malay and ultra-Chinese without breaking BN apart.

There have already been a few steps in this direction, in attempting to protest the composition of various new governments on the basis of protecting Malay rights. So far, I’m not seeing any major uproar or mass uprising, making the preliminary suggestion that this tack is not likely to get Umno far (perhaps somewhat due as well to the perception that ultra-Malayness has been effectively used as an insincere cover for ultra-corruption, combined with the potentially unpopular anti-palace stance Umno seems to be taking).

In this political landscape, what are the choices political players face?

For the non-Malay parties, the dilemma is not really a dilemma. I think there is no earthly chance that the calculations somehow show that supporting (a sinking) Umno will lead to a better future for non-Malays.

BN component parties find themselves in the deserted spot that they are in quite simply because they backed what they wrongly thought to be the only winning horse in town.

As for the Malays? I think with a credible, clean leadership as provided for by KeADILan and PAS, many fears that Umno continuously plays on will be allayed.

Results across urban west Malaysia at least strongly suggest that Malays want no part of the NEP if it’s a policy benefitting Umno and leaves the rest of them out in the cold. Unless the alternative parties screw up the economy so badly or really start ‘pawning off’ Malay rights, there’s not going to be much reason to go back to Umno either.

Without incumbency - already so precariously hanging in the balance - an even more ultra Umno has very little to offer.

The other direction to go is to merge all BN component parties.

An interesting (though not particularly likely) suggestion, we then would have to see what separates BN from its opposites.

I think in those circumstances, there will quite literally no ideological difference between the two sides. Even PAS now talks about a Welfare State instead of an Islamic one, part of a massive image overhaul, which probably accounts for their victories in urban, mixed seats.

This is a rare situation that requires some consideration. It would be a two party system without a whole lot of ways to differentiate between the two sides.

How then will the battle lines be drawn? I believe it will all come down to track record of governance.

The rakyat will compare what they’ve experienced under 50 years of BN rule with the next few months and years of the alternative.

The competition will then be to see who can rule better, and this competition can only be good for the rakyat.

How is BN doing so far?

Clearly, there are a few at least token steps towards reform. People like Zaid Ibrahim and Shahrir Samad being the most touted examples.

Mat Taib probably cancels all that out all by himself. Not only a minister but Selangor chief as well, there are few clearer indications that Abdullah is light years away from being 100% committed to reform and sacrificing old corruption for new integrity.

This is almost a pity.

Some may think I am oversimplifying, but in politics one must have the goods. You can have all the papers, the television stations and so on, or you can have just the internet, leaflets and ceramahs - at the end of the day, it’s your message and your credentials.

With the endless new appointments, the government had a chance to show that it understood this, and abandon both race-based politics and corruption, but clearly it is only willing to make a few token steps with one hand, and let the other hand continue business as usual.

This, alongside the leadership crisis brewing, could spell the extinction of BN.

And what happens if they do disappear?

A one-party system has never been good for Malaysia, and I doubt it ever will, regardless of which party that is.

If no significant political force steps up to play a proper check and balance role, it may well fall to civil society to increase their capacity to be watchdogs and guardians against abuses of power.

I’m not sure how interesting any of this is, but I wanted to get my thoughts down in writing about the larger canvass before going back into the nitty gritty of details and squabbles.

I think we covered some really important ground on March 8th, and *perhaps* the worst is over. There’s no doubt however, that the new state governments are going to have to go above and beyond in their effort to become responsible, caring, transparent and honest servants of the people.

Tags-

:)

problems resolved for now.. :) still growing, still evolving.. some challenges in life require the best from us constantly, but some things are worth it :)

ps- a belated Salam Maulidur Rasul and Happy Easter :)

Tags-

:(

jelas.info is probably going to take a break for a while. very sorry, but i need to sort through some serious personal issues that have taken full priority. don’t worry about me, but do forgive if i neglect this for a while.

Tags-